The SAT Controversy :: essays papers

The SAT Controversy 1) According to the video and the article, who and how was the SAT created and for what reason? The SAT, or as it was brought at the outset, the Scholastic Aptitude Test, had its introduction in the late 1930’s. In 1933, a man of his word by the name of James Bryant Conant turned into the leader of Harvard University. At the time he became president, just the tip top in the zone were conceded into Harvard. This unmistakable social gathering was all male, all white, all Protestant, generally Episcopalian. They fundamentally were descendents of the Puritans who had originated from Europe. These were average individuals yet they had framed an exceptionally shut gathering, very nearly a club, and controlled everything. James Conant was not especially enamored with this gathering and he needed to open the hold they had on Harvard as well as on the entirety of America. He had a dream, which really started with Thomas Jefferson, that there were individuals across America who were exceptionally keen, extremely capable, and effective and you expected to discover them, instruct th em and afterward let them run the nation. His objective was a tactless society. In any case, he required an approach to recognize these individuals so he could carry them to Harvard to get that instruction. As a stage toward that path, Conant founded another grant program for young men who were scholastically skilled and who didn't originate from the world class Eastern live-in schools where Harvard had constantly gotten its understudies. Be that as it may, Conan required an approach to assess these understudies. He gave that assignment to his associate senior member, Henry Chauncey. Henry Chauncey was an exceptionally aggressive person who adored mental testing. Chauncey met a man, named Carl Brigham who had been a piece of the army’s IQ testing group during World War I. In the end, Carl Brigham adjusted the army’s IQ test for use in school confirmations and Chauncey revealed back to Conant about the new SAT test. Conant needed affirmation, notwithstanding, that this test was a trial of unadulterated insight and not of the nature of the training an understudy had gotten. Him that young men of low or unobtrusive methods and tutoring not be punished. Chauncey consoled Conant and the SAT was embraced to assess the candidates for the grant to Harvard. Later it was acknowledged as the selection test into Harvard for all understudies and in the long run all Ivy League schools.